<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Number twos</title>
	<link>http://chilco.textdrive.com/~dmahugh/2006/10/18/number-twos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: George Siede</title>
		<link>http://chilco.textdrive.com/~dmahugh/2006/10/18/number-twos/#comment-3763</link>
		<author>George Siede</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chilco.textdrive.com/~dmahugh/2006/10/18/number-twos/#comment-3763</guid>
		<description>That's an amazing article from the Washington  Post! I forwarded it to a bunch of friends.

George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an amazing article from the Washington  Post! I forwarded it to a bunch of friends.</p>
<p>George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://chilco.textdrive.com/~dmahugh/2006/10/18/number-twos/#comment-3591</link>
		<author>Doug</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chilco.textdrive.com/~dmahugh/2006/10/18/number-twos/#comment-3591</guid>
		<description>Call me a pessimist, but I'm doubtful that we've got many Number Fours down there.  &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/29/AR2006042900145_pf.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Or terrorists, for that matter.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me a pessimist, but I&#8217;m doubtful that we&#8217;ve got many Number Fours down there.  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/29/AR2006042900145_pf.html" rel="nofollow">Or terrorists, for that matter.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://chilco.textdrive.com/~dmahugh/2006/10/18/number-twos/#comment-3589</link>
		<author>Tom</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chilco.textdrive.com/~dmahugh/2006/10/18/number-twos/#comment-3589</guid>
		<description>Of course, if we capture, say, ten Number Twos, that's twice as many as ten Number Ones. God, think what we could do with a Guantanamo full of Number Fours.

Or ...

perhaps this is a larger war on middle management. Once this war is over, this technology will be declassified and Number Twos throughout corporate America will have to fish or cut bait. Like when Al Gore declassified the Internet and we all got to see porn without having to ask a clerk for it (again, taking out a superfluous and sometimes awkward level of human interaction). 

Or perhaps I've said too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, if we capture, say, ten Number Twos, that&#8217;s twice as many as ten Number Ones. God, think what we could do with a Guantanamo full of Number Fours.</p>
<p>Or &#8230;</p>
<p>perhaps this is a larger war on middle management. Once this war is over, this technology will be declassified and Number Twos throughout corporate America will have to fish or cut bait. Like when Al Gore declassified the Internet and we all got to see porn without having to ask a clerk for it (again, taking out a superfluous and sometimes awkward level of human interaction). </p>
<p>Or perhaps I&#8217;ve said too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
